VERTEX AI TRY-ON ALTERNATIVE

Genlook vs. Google Vertex AI Virtual Try-On

Google's Virtual Try-On model renders clothing very well, at $0.06 an image inside a Google Cloud project. Genlook is a try-on API at $0.02 that covers every product type and handles the work around the model.

Thibault Mathian

Written by Thibault Mathian, founder of Genlook. Genlook makes one of the two products compared here. Competitor facts were last checked on October 7, 2026 against their public listings and docs, linked in Sources.

01 · The short verdict

A strong model, or a finished try-on API.

Both produce excellent clothing try-ons. They differ in price, product coverage and how much you build around the call.

Google Vertex AI

Built for Google Cloud teams

  • Excellent clothing results in our benchmark, close to Genlook's
  • Runs in your Google Cloud project, EU regions included
  • Up to 4 output images per request
  • $0.06 per image; $0.048 only on a 3-year savings plan
  • Clothing only, one product per request, synchronous calls
  • virtual-try-on-001 is deprecated; retirement set for March 2027

Genlook

Built for shipping try-on

  • $0.02 per try-on on plans, down to $0.015
  • Any product type: clothing, shoes, glasses, jewelry, hats, wigs
  • Async with webhooks, plus batches at half a credit
  • One stable contract while the engine improves behind it

02 · Feature by feature

Where each API stands.

Checked against Google Cloud's model pages, pricing and release notes on the date above.

Genlook
Google Vertex AI

Price per try-on

$0.02 on plans, down to $0.015; $0.04 pay as you go

$0.06; $0.054 or $0.048 on 1- or 3-year savings plans

Free start

10 free credits, keys in minutes

$300 Google Cloud credit for new customers

Speed

8.2s median

No published figure; 11 to 12.5s in our benchmark

Product types

Any product type, one endpoint

Clothing; no published category list

Delivery

Sync call, or async with webhooks; batches at half a credit

Synchronous predict call; no batch inference

Model lifecycle

Same endpoint; engine updates behind it

Deprecated Sept 14, 2026; retirement March 15, 2027

Setup

An API key

Google Cloud project, billing, IAM and the Vertex AI API

End-user data

User records, deletion API, image auto-expiry

Not offered; storage and records are yours

Data use

Never used to train models

Not used for training without your permission

Same photos, same day

Genlook and Vertex AI, side by side.

From our September 2026 benchmark: the same shopper photo and product photo sent to each API, default settings, one run each, unretouched. Times and prices are what each run took and cost; Genlook's time is its production median at the time.

See all 10 APIs on 8 garments

Trench coat, packshot

Vertex dressed the coat but removed the shopper's jeans. Genlook kept them and matched the knee length.

Trench coat, packshot: Shopper photo
Trench coat, packshot: Product photo
Trench coat, packshot: Genlook result
Genlook9.8s median · $0.020
Trench coat, packshot: Google Vertex AI result
Google Vertex AI12.5s · $0.060

Lace wedding gown

Both render the lace bodice and tulle skirt faithfully. A close call.

Lace wedding gown: Shopper photo
Lace wedding gown: Product photo
Lace wedding gown: Genlook result
Genlook9.8s median · $0.020
Lace wedding gown: Google Vertex AI result
Google Vertex AI11.6s · $0.060

Football shirt with sponsor text

Both keep the sponsor text readable and the stripes aligned.

Football shirt with sponsor text: Shopper photo
Football shirt with sponsor text: Product photo
Football shirt with sponsor text: Genlook result
Genlook9.8s median · $0.020
Football shirt with sponsor text: Google Vertex AI result
Google Vertex AI12.0s · $0.060

03 · The real difference

A model endpoint, or the whole try-on layer

On clothing, Google's model is one of the best we have tested. In our September benchmark it matched Genlook on most garments, and its only unwanted change in eight tries was removing a shopper's jeans under a long coat. If your stack already lives in Google Cloud and you only need garments, it is a serious option.

What you get is a model endpoint. Each call takes one person image and one product image and returns up to four images synchronously; there are no webhooks, no batch mode and no records of your end users. Coverage is clothing, with no published category list for shoes, glasses or jewelry. And the model has its own lifecycle: virtual-try-on-001 reached general availability in January 2026, was marked deprecated on September 14, 2026, and is set to retire in March 2027, with Google's docs now listing Gemini image models as try-on options. Each change is a migration on your side.

How Genlook handles it

Genlook sells the try-on layer as one API. The same endpoint covers clothing, shoes, glasses, jewelry, hats and wigs, answers synchronously or through webhooks, and runs large jobs as batches at half a credit. End users are records you can delete on request, uploaded images expire on a schedule you choose, and when a better model appears the engine changes behind the same contract, listed in the changelog. A try-on costs $0.02 on a plan and $0.015 at volume, a third of Vertex's list price.

If you need clothing only, run everything inside Google Cloud and want to own the integration, Vertex is a strong pick. If you want every product type, a stable contract and the operations included, start with Genlook.

04 · In practice

What the Genlook API is tuned for.

Any product type

Clothing, shoes, glasses, jewelry, hats and wigs through one endpoint, with no category parameter to manage.

A contract that stays put

Engine improvements land behind the same endpoint. No model ids to track, no deprecation notices to plan around.

Async when you need it

Webhooks for completed and failed generations, and batches of up to 500 try-ons at half a credit each.

End-user data handled

User records, a deletion endpoint for privacy requests, and image retention of 1, 3 or 7 days.

05 · Switching

Moving from Vertex AI.

Create a key

Self-serve at platform.genlook.app, 10 free credits included. No cloud project, billing account or IAM setup.

Replace the predict call

Send the same person and product images to Genlook's try-on endpoint, synchronously or with a webhook. Shoes, glasses and jewelry work through the same call.

Go live

Plans start at $20 a month for 1,000 try-ons ($0.02 each), down to $0.015 at volume, or pay as you go at $0.04. No model deprecation dates to track.

06 · FAQ

Questions, answered.

How much does Google's Virtual Try-On cost?↓

$0.06 per generated image on Vertex AI. Google's savings plans bring it to $0.054 with a 1-year commitment or $0.048 with a 3-year commitment. Genlook costs $0.02 per try-on on a plan, down to $0.015 at volume, or $0.04 pay as you go.

Is Vertex AI's try-on better than Genlook's?↓

On clothing, the two were close in our benchmark: both rendered lace, prints and sponsor text faithfully. Vertex removed a shopper's jeans under a long coat once; Genlook made no unwanted changes in that run. The bigger differences are coverage (Vertex is clothing only), price and the integration work around the call.

Is virtual-try-on-001 being retired?↓

Google's model page lists a deprecation date of September 14, 2026 and a retirement date of March 15, 2027, and its try-on guide now also lists Gemini image models. Plan a migration if you build on it. Genlook keeps one endpoint and updates the engine behind it.

Does Vertex AI try-on work for shoes, glasses or jewelry?↓

Google's docs describe it for clothing and publish no category list for accessories. Genlook covers clothing, shoes, glasses, jewelry, hats and wigs through the same endpoint.

Can I test both?↓

Yes. New Google Cloud customers get $300 in credit, and Genlook accounts start with 10 free credits. Send the same photos to both and compare the results on your own catalog.

Sources

Build try-on into your product.

Self-serve keys, ten free credits, and two API calls to your first generation.